Billing for pain management practices: What to watch for

Billing for pain management practices: What to watch for

Billing for Pain Management Practices: What to Watch For

Pain management billing combines elements of primary care, anesthesia, and interventional procedures—all under one roof. It’s a high-revenue specialty, but it’s also one of the most closely scrutinized when it comes to documentation, coding, and medical necessity.

Whether you’re onboarding a new pain management provider or refining your approach, here are the key areas to watch.


1. High-Risk Procedures Require Ironclad Documentation

Pain management often involves procedures like nerve blocks, epidural injections, spinal cord stimulators, and radiofrequency ablation. These procedures can trigger audits if not properly justified.

What to watch for:

  • Detailed documentation of medical necessity

  • Use of appropriate ICD-10 codes to support the procedure

  • Clear evidence of conservative treatment failure before intervention

  • Imaging reports or physical exam findings that back up the diagnosis

Tip: When in doubt, review local coverage determinations (LCDs) from Medicare for guidance on required documentation.


2. Modality Coding and Modifier Use Can Make or Break a Claim

Many pain practices use fluoroscopy or ultrasound guidance during procedures, which are separately billable—but only if coded and modified correctly.

What to watch for:

  • Use of guidance codes like 77002 (fluoroscopy) or 76942 (ultrasound)

  • Applying the correct modifier (e.g., -26 for professional component when applicable)

  • Avoiding unbundling errors—some procedures include imaging in the global code

Tip: Review NCCI edits before billing multiple services together.


3. Urine Drug Testing (UDT) Is a Compliance Hotspot

Pain practices often conduct regular UDTs to monitor opioid compliance. This is an area payers monitor closely for overuse and upcoding.

What to watch for:

  • Distinguish between presumptive (e.g., 80305–80307) and definitive testing (e.g., G0480–G0483)

  • Don’t bill both presumptive and definitive for the same sample unless payer policy allows

  • Keep documentation of why testing was ordered and how results were used

Tip: Make sure frequency of testing is medically justified and follows payer policy.


4. Multiple Providers and Incident-To Billing

Some pain management practices involve MDs, PAs, and NPs all working under one roof. Incident-to billing can be used in some settings, but rules must be followed exactly.

What to watch for:

  • Ensure the supervising physician is physically present when required

  • Use the correct NPI for each provider

  • If billing under the physician, verify the services meet incident-to criteria

Tip: For Medicare, incident-to is only allowed in the office setting, not in facilities or outpatient surgery centers.


5. Payer-Specific Rules for Interventional Pain Procedures

Some private payers have unique pre-authorization or frequency limits for injections, implants, or stimulation trials.

What to watch for:

  • Prior authorization requirements for SCS implants, facet injections, or RFA

  • Frequency limits (e.g., only a certain number of injections per region per year)

  • Documentation of functional improvement following previous procedures

Tip: Keep a quick-reference guide for each major payer’s interventional billing policies.


6. Out-of-Network Considerations for ASC Services

Some pain providers operate in ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs), which adds another layer of billing complexity—especially if the ASC is out-of-network.

What to watch for:

  • Separate billing for facility and professional fees

  • Understanding of how UCR rates or gap exceptions affect reimbursement

  • Clear communication with patients about balance billing, if applicable

Tip: When possible, verify OON benefits in advance and get written acknowledgment from patients.


Conclusion:

Pain management billing isn’t just about CPT codes—it’s about understanding the unique intersection of procedure coding, medical necessity, and payer policy. Small mistakes in documentation or modifier use can delay high-dollar claims or flag audits.

By staying current with payer guidelines and refining your workflows around these high-risk areas, you can help pain management practices get paid efficiently—and stay compliant while doing it.

    • Related Articles

    • Primary care vs. specialty care billing: What sets them apart?

      Primary Care vs. Specialty Care Billing: What Sets Them Apart? At first glance, billing for primary care and specialty care may seem similar—both involve CPT codes, modifiers, and payer rules. But beneath the surface, the workflows, coding habits, ...
    • Billing for mental health providers: Key differences and best practices

      Billing for Mental Health Providers: Key Differences and Best Practices Billing for mental health services isn’t the same as billing for general medical care. It comes with its own set of codes, coverage rules, and documentation expectations. For ...
    • Navigating cardiology billing: Complex codes and compliance tips

      Navigating Cardiology Billing: Complex Codes and Compliance Tips Cardiology billing is one of the most intricate areas in medical revenue cycle management. Between diagnostic testing, interventional procedures, and E/M coding across multiple care ...
    • How to handle high-volume coding in chiropractic services

      How to Handle High-Volume Coding in Chiropractic Services Chiropractic practices often deal with high patient volume and frequent repeat visits—which means high-volume coding is a daily reality. For medical billing licensees, this creates both ...
    • Special considerations for billing physical therapy services

      Special Considerations for Billing Physical Therapy Services Billing for physical therapy (PT) services involves unique rules, time-based codes, and payer-specific policies that differ from many other specialties. For medical billing licensees, ...